![]() Rationale: It's useful for an LKO ship with just a DP-10 to be able to connect to the communications network. I'd suggest going for a lower altitude, like 500 km, and having a few more satellites. I agree that 150 km is too low, but I'd suggest that 1000 is a bit high. orbit (basically just the height of the PE you need). Again, that website I linked like 4 times will GIVE you the proper res. To get the spacing right (and Snark and I obviously have different methods), that is what using resonant orbits is for: If you release a sat at the same point on each orbit, the spacing will automatically be correct (IF you have the proper resonant orbit for the amount of sats you want to deploy, in a given orbit). On manned flights, I usually put it on the command pod (which will be re-entering and landing), or for unmanned launches, I usually put it on the 1st stage (just make sure you have at least a Comm16 or someother antenna on the part of the craft that will go to orbit) For the last satellite you will use one of the two neighbors as a target, not the one you started with (which should be opposite the planet).ĭont need the DP-10 on each sat. Then make sure the orbital periods match as perfect as possible and you are done. So pick one satellite as a starting point, set it as the target for the two neighbors and make the closest approach markers show 1,555.635km. With the satellites you want your closest approach to be the value over the blue line on the upper image of that tool. This works the same way as a rendezvous, but with a rendezvous you are trying to get an closest approach as close as possible. Once you have done that you should have a working network but you can fine tune the separation. This makes it easy, release a satellite, circularize it, wait for the vehicle to go around, repeat 3 more times. You can use either one, so one point will be 500km, and the other point will be Higher (852.874km) or Lower Period (116.06km). Higher Period) which will set your launch vehicle up to get relatively accurate separation in one orbit. What it tells you there is both a Pe (i.e. Now, I find that a bit confusing but it means multiple satellites on one launch, not multiple launches. Enter your relevant data (Kerbin, 500km, etc) then scroll down to where it says "Multiple Launch View". That web planner helps you with that too. ![]() ![]() And positioning them is a breeze- each time you want to launch a new satellite, just wait until the constellation orbits around to the desired position and then launch the new guy straight into the slot where you want it. If you have 6 or 7 satellites up there, in practical terms you'll never have a gap. Simpler to just launch a few extra satellites, then a bit of positioning error here and there doesn't matter much. A minimal comsat with just a Communotron-16 and a couple of solar panels costs practically nothing to launch.Īnd I also don't worry too much about trying to get them spaced just right. It may not be optimally efficient in terms of cash, but they're so dirt-cheap anyway that it doesn't matter much, and it saves a lot of hassle and head-scratching. Personally, I always go with just doing individual satellite launches. To space it evenly I could have an orbit of 250 km and 500 km and then let the probes circularize to 500 km after reaching Periaps each time with the main ship, right? So 4 satellites with comm 16 and a dp 10 need to be launched at equal distances right?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |